Cutia Taranului & Rain

We had a very wet spring this year. We had plenty of rain but less early warmth. Corn grew early and fast however vegetables were slower to grow.

IMPACT1: Field grown vegetables have been growing slower then last year.

But then the rain stopped and people got religious … some more then others. Some people have no irrigation solutions so they get really religious really fast as they watch their crops dry. Others have small water-holes created not by gathering rain but by excavating until they penetrates an aquifer so that springs create a small reservoire of water. They use gas-driven pumps to move water into the fields and have been watching the water level go way down … so their religion is a bit more laid back … but still … they too are praying for rains.

IMPACT2: Peasants income is late to appear and to a degree in doubt this year.
IMPACT3: Peasants live in fear.
IMPACT4: Cutia Taranului members need to be patient … investing more energy then they thought they would in this mutual relationship with their fellow peasants.

By now the corn too is starting to show signs of dryness. It had a great start but it too needs water to continue growing.

IMPACT5: There may be less yield of corn, less to feed the animals, more expenses in buying feed … coupled with less income from selling food = difficult.

The pastures have given good yield so far but may not continue to yield enough hay for another cutting. Hay needs to be cut in dry conditions so that it can dry in the sun before it is collected … so summer is pretty much the only time

IMPACT6: Gradually less and less small peasant families with 2 or 3 cows … much work, not enough value … and way too much trouble.

This morning we awoke to a hopeful drizzle. It paused and later turned into a promising summer rain … that lasted 20 minutes … then the sun came out and the hope went away. Within a couple of hours most of the earth was again dry. Rain … it is so immediate, so powerful, so far reaching. Of course the worries may be eased at least temporaily somewhat with a few rains … but the instablity and fears remain.

We hope Cutia Taranului will create stability for both consumers in the city and peasant producers. Yet we ar convinced that selling food is just one (though a critical) step on on the way. The way food is grown will have to change too … water supply is diminishing (water tables are dropping), the earth (yes, even AND especially the earth that will supply the wonderful vegetables that will begin delivery next week) is dying, work is getting harder and weather is becoming less predictable and more extreme (it isn’t global warming that worries peasants, it’s singular local events that threatens their livelihood).

For me, that’s the heart and motivation of Cutia Taranului. We live and grow our food in the same weather conditions, we face similar challenges. We have already begun to explore alternative approaches that create better and more resilient conditions and we hope, through Cutia Taranului, to both continue our exploration and then share our experiences in the hope that stability can be achieved in the face of coming uncertainties.

 

Go Around: Cutia Taranului & Romanian Politics

Romanian politics have managed to infiltrate into my consciouess through the very thin and filtered funnel of information that reaches me from the world. I know very little about Romanian government or politics. I don’t know more because every time I’ve thought about learning more I realized I don’t want nor feel a need to know more. In my mind there is practically no government in Romania. There is an inevitable beaurocratic system that runs parallel day to day life … beyond that there is a void.

Void’s tend to fill up and the void that was where a Romanian government should have been has indeed filled up with two powerful substances that are heating up and heading towards combustion. One lethal substance is corruption – a persistent residue left behind from communist and dicatorship times. The other lethal substance is corporate greed which has probably always been present but escalated dramatically since Romania joined the EU and became addicted to dependent on EU/IMF “bailout” funding. The bad news is that corruption and greed bind tightly to each other … the good news is that they also burn out together.

This burning out is apparent all over the world … even (and especially?) in so called democracies where corruption is not supposed to be as dominant a factor. Economic collapses, disasters and corruption are outranked only by the outraged voices speaking helplessly out against them. I assume that these economic waves have sent out ripples here in Romania as well, but it seems to me that to a lesser degree (I haven’t heard, yet?, of any banks collapsing in Romania).

When I lived in Israel this, oh so typical, combination of local government corruption and global financial storms worried me. My life was tightly integrated and dependent on money which in turn was strongly influenced by both. However here in Romania, where both the corruption runs deeper and after the world economic crisis has continued to escalate, I am not worried. Not at all. I’m not worried because we live a village life. Plants are very sensitive to water (rains are expected this weekend and during next week) … however they are relatively immune to politics, economics and corruption. The same goes for chickens, cows, goats, sheep and pigs – they all continue to grow and produce regardless of any political or financial turmoil. Horses and carriages (unlike tractors) are unmoved by continue to move regardless of the rising prices of gas. Life here is resilient.

When I say “here” I don’t just mean our village … but village-life in Romania. Village life in Romania is not a neglibile phenomenon, it represents almost half of the population … it IS Romania. This makes Romania, as a country (in my mind) a relatively resilient place. Resilient enough to withstand corruption and greed? I don’t know and I am not waiting around to find out.

I prefer Romanian corruption to developed, western, industrialized/capitalized corruption. I prefer it because it is visible and blunt. It makes an easier target then, for example, western corruption where money and politics are in bed together behind close doors. Here in Romania politicians are childish compared to their western counterparts … they do everything out in the open.

The question is what to do about it? I am not one to go marching in the streets in protest. Protesting against something is not in my nature and, in my opinion, not enough (the current political situation in Romania is a direct result of the protests held here just a few months ago) … there has to be an alternative constructive path to complement destruction. Romanian politics have (in a few months) gone through most of the alternatives … and what we currently see is simply what is left. Upcoming national elections are practically meaningless if all you can do is choose between not choosing and choosing the best of the worst.

My opinion is that instead of picking an unwinnable fight, it is better to step back, regroup and to aim to completely circumvent existing problems. Cutia Taranului is an example of such a strategy.  Local grown Romanian produce has been pushed aside by many social, market and political forces. I am resisting a temptation to make a short list of these forces … I believe they all deserve deep caring inspection and attention. I will instead give one current example of a destructive policy about to go into effect.

If you are a Romanian peasant who, for example, saves tomatoe seeds (very easy to do) from this years tomatoes to plant next year, you may find that next year you will not be allowed to sell those tomatoes in markets (or any other official channel). Current legislation (I don’t know exactly where it is in the legislative process) will make it illegal to sell produce that was not grown from authorized purchased seeds (with proper paperwork to prove it) … making it illegal to sell produce grown from saved seeds. This is a direct product of greed (agro-businesses interested in selling their seeds) and corruption (local politicians making a profit from cooperating with agro-businesses). Mind you, this immoral, unsustainable, dangerous change is going to be perfectly “legal”.

Cutia Taranului was born when I asked myself what could be done about the current situation. I didn’t (and still don’t believe) in trying to fight or change the current reality. I did (and still do) believe in creating an alternate reality: if I am a peasant and you are a friend from the city, nothing can prevent me from giving you food I have grown and nothing can prevent you from paying me something in return for that food. No legal, social or political energy can prevent that from happening. It is in that spirit that Cutia Taranului was created. It is designed to go around all the existing obstacles directly into a new, simple and direct paradigm.

Cutia Taraului provides affordable food safety for city-dwellers and financial safety for peasants. It is a sustainable community that is resilient in the face of current and future political storms (and then some). It is also a strategy I would to see replicated on a national scale. I hope to be able to support and partake in an effort to create an alternative socio-political reality, in the spirit of Cutia Taranului, that will completely circumvent the existing and dominant socio-political forces and propel Romania into a new, simpler and more direct social paradigm.

Because of its immature political culture I believe Romania is a unique position not only to better itself but also to become a role model for other countries. In Greece there is talk of a “potato revolution” and people are turning to farming to escape economic collapse. In the midst of economic collapse Greece is trying to become, of all things, Romania! If you put on the right shade of glasses you will see that (a) Romania is in many ways ahead of the curve and (b) staying true to this course requires inventing a new future rather then expending energy on impossible obstacles.

Like it or not, our relationship to Earth is changing. Indeed, our consciousness has changed already … We all want ecological healing. We all want to enter into a new relationship to Earth. Our consciousness has shifted from the early-20th century ideal of conquering nature. However, our institutions, whether money or politics, are not yet in accordance with our changed consciousness. They trap us into behavior that no one really chooses and render us helpless to avert our collision course with catastrophe.

Charles Einstein

Cutia Taranului is not enough but I think it is facing in the right direction … and it is no coincidence that it has taken root so well in, of all places, Romania 🙂

 

The “I Told You So” Bread Post

The first peasant-boxes that have been delivered to both Cluj & Bucharest have been of baked goods – primarily bread with an addition of something sweet and/or something salty. They come in two sizes and most people ordered the smaller box. It includes  two 1kg loafs of bread. Romanians eat a lot of bread so this amount is actually quite ordinary. However a few people let us know that it was just too much bread for them to consume!

We also purchased bread from Iulian and what happened is exactly what I wrote about in the “Food is not cheap” post. The bread is so rich and so fulfilling that we, and probably many others, ended up eating much less of it. When we are hungry we can go through 3 (or even 4) slices of regular bread each … but we have a hard time taking in 2 slices of Iulian’s bread. It is that much more nourishing than typical bread.

When Iulian (Cluj) and Lucian  (Bucharest) chose their box sizes they did so based on “average consumption”. We didn’t take into consideration that due to the nourishing qualities of the bread people would need less of it. We also didn’t want it to appear that the box did not have enough bread to feed a family. So we ended up with a box that simply has too much bread for some people 🙂 It’s a great mistake to make 🙂

The people who experienced too much bread also experienced “the box is too  expensive”. Iulian’s bread is a premium product and so it isn’t meant to be cheap … but if you have more then you can handle … then it surely can feel expensive. But what was actually unveiled was how expensive ordinary bread really is. It doesn’t feel expensive because you get quantitatively more of it … but nutrition wise you need to consume twice as much of it to satisfy your hunger (and again … I’m not even going into qualitative nutritional values which ordinary bread simple does not have … no matter how much of it you eat). So Iulian’s healthy nourishing bread only seems expensive but once you realize its true value you quickly realize it isn’t really expensive at all. In my mind Iulian’s bread is actually priceless …  you will be hard pressed to find anything like it in Romania in anything but rare specialty shops. However those people who joined the box have this priceless food delivered to their doorstep freshly baked every week.

However,  I expect we will soon be announcing a third smaller and cheaper box for people who need less of it but still want to enjoy the amazing nourishment of quality bread 🙂

Bread Party in Cluj

Last friday was a city day (first in quite a few weeks). We chose that day because it coincided with the first delivery day of Iulian’s bread-boxes in Cluj. We started the day by loading the car with 140 firebricks (quite an effort) and then went to pick up Iulian from the bus station and together goto the EcoRuralis offices.

There we were met by our friends at EcoRuralis and Elza – a reporter from TransylvaniaLive, the same reporter who originally interviewed Andreea together with Ildi and Levente. I dropped Andreea, Iulian and his son there and went off to park the car. By the time I got back to the EcoRuralis offices, the place was festive. Iulian’s giant suitcase was open and filled to the brim with bread. Some of the bread (the box EcoRuralis ordered) was already laid out on the windo-sill … and as a backdrop EcoRuralis’ exemplary city-garden was flourishing in the background.

Elza againt dedicated precious time and caring attention (unique in Romania’s poor journalistic landscape) we greatly appreciate and embrace. She interviewed Iulian, Otti of EcoRuralis and Andreea. That same day this article appeared online. Elza promised to meet us again when Ildi and Levente begin their delivery (if all goes well, within the next two weeks) … and then all the video footage will be assembled and broadcast in the news.

Then everyone went indoors and went at the amazingly delicious and diverse bread Iulian brought with him. There was happiness and abundance in the air. I could feel the energy in my heart expanding … a physical sensation that I don’t get to experience much. After months of work Cutia Taranului was becoming a festive reality (it actually started earlier in the week earlier in Bucharest with Lucian’s bread-boxes … but we weren’t there to witness it first hand). I am not a party goer … but this was turning out to be a real party.

Everyone present cared, embraced and rejoiced in Cutia Taranului. Everyone contributed to making it happen. We were happy together. Is that not a party?

As I write these words Lucian has already completed a 2nd delivery of boxes. Though not as exciting as the “first time” … it is hugely gratifying to see Cutia Taranului moving into a regular and recurring flow … as we imagined and hoped it would be.

We are now waiting for a 2nd first celebration with Ildi and Levente … which may very well mark the beginning of all 3 families that will be delivering vegetables to Cluj.

In addition, in the coming weeks we hope to announce a first box of milk products to Cluj and Andreea is continuously speaking to more peasants who are in the process of joining and offering their goods both in Cluj and other locations. It is wonerful to be a part of this awakening 🙂

Update: we just found that a video has been published online at TransilvaniaLive … so have a look 🙂

The Remaining 5%

A question has come up in discussions regarding Cutia Taranului. The question circles around “what do the peasants get out of this” (this being Cutia Taranului) … usually with an undertone that is really asking “how are the peasants being exploited this time”. So, first of all, a great thank you to everyone who brought up the question. It is a just and important question since the peasants have been subject to years of exploitation and abuse. However, we were also slightly offended by the question because nothing could be further from our mind. With those two energies now consolidated I believe we can now answer that question thoroughly.

Caring Attention

We spend hours (sometimes many hours) over a period of weeks (sometimes many weeks … months) on the phone and when possible face-to-face with peasants that contact us (the only peasant family we reached out to were Ildi and Levente – our neighbors and first peasant family to join the project, all the other peasants learn about the project and contact us to inquire about it) regarding the project. It takes patience and conscious effort to communicate to them our intentions and how Cutia Taranului works.

We face much doubt and skepticism. We place no pressure on anyone to join. We realize that Cutia Taranului brings with and demands of peasant-families a huge cultural and intellectual shift … we appreciate every peasant family who gives us the opportunity to share Cutia Taranului with them. We are in awe of every peasant family that finds the courage to give it a try. (And we look forward to rejoicing with every peasant family that succeeds.)

When a peasant family expresses an interest to join the project, the conversation moves the next phase.

Personal Guidance

We learn from every peasant what they create and explore different directions for putting together a relevant and feasible box. Relevancy means a box that can provide a valuable and useful service to people in the city. Feasible means that the peasant can organize and deliver the box in an efficient and financial way. Financial means that at the end of a day of deliveries they are left with a decent profit.

That last “financial” part may seem obvious but in almost every case, if left to their own decisions, peasants will come up with either (1) nothing; (2) a box that is either irrelevant (people in the city are not likely to be interested in it) or (3) insustainable effort (the peasant family may end up losing money or making an insignificant profit). Our objective is not to flood the website with boxes, but to put out correct and relevant boxes that will, hopefully, be embraced by people in the city (as has been the case so far).

After numerous iterations we usually arrive at a good box and … we move to the next phase

Launch and “Adverstising”

We ask peasants families to write a page introducing themselves and to provide us with a photograph of them. However most peasants are not writers  so … most of the time Andreea ends up interviewing them and authoring a page for them. The rest of the time Andreea reviews and offers editorial suggestions based on our past experience. When possible we usually end up photographing them too.

Andreea then continues to write (or help edit) a description of the boxes and the menu of additional, optional products. We publish all that information on the website, present it to them (which sometimes isn’t trivial … since they don’t aways have Internet access) and ask them to review it. We also add their information into the Cutia Taranului information system (which is being contantly developed as the needs of the project unfold).

We then send a notification to people who have signed up to the constantly growing (all over Romania) waiting list … we give them 24 hours advance notice to decide if they want to join. Then we begin to spread the word about the new boxes to the growing Cutia Taranului social-network. Then registrations begin.

Registration

Every registration arrives at our information system and begins a carefully monitored process. We relay registration information to peasant-families (when possible by email, many times by phone). We remind them that they need to call new members within a day or two to confirm the registration.  We offer them guidance on how to speak on the phone, what needs to be asked, what needs to be avoided … how to be thorough, friendly and effective. We (try) to make sure that they do so in an orderly way by confirming with them after they speak to every member.

We then produce for them organized reports of their member lists and stay in touch until boxes are ready to deliver. We try to assist them in organizing an effective delivery route (instead of zig-zagging throughout the city). When necessary we send email updates to all the members of a box to let them know how things are coming along.

First Delivery

Before the first delivery we try make sure everything is in order. We send members an email letting them know that boxes are expected and what they (as members) can do to help in the process.

We then wait with excitement to hear from peasants and hopefully members how was their experience. Delivery of boxes has just begun so we are just now beginning to move into a reliable and recurring delivery schedule.

Payment

We charge peasant-families nothing for this entire process. We do it patienly and passionately and with no strings attached. Members pay the peasant directly. 95% of the revenues stay with the peasant. We ask for a 5% monthly donation (at the end of every month – based on actual sales) to support our continued work.

Ironically we’ve been systemically criticized by anyone with any business experience that 5% is too little to ask in return for what we do. We’ve spent a lot of energy speaking to these people about our motivations and reasoning. Despite continuous pressures to change this number we haven’t. We are very happy with it. So are peasants (who currently pay a lot more for a lot less).

The Remaining 5%

This is where the story takes an interesting twist. Everyone seems to be interested in the bottom line number but not a single person has asked where that money will go. Here is a list of things on our agenda:

  1. Funding our continued research on sustainable agriculture in Romania. We would like to see traditional Romanian agriculture evolve beyond where it is to better practices. We would like to see a system of agriculture that:
    • Is better for the land itself and takes precious care of of soil fertility for future generations (as opposed to the current paradigm in which soil fertility is constantly degraded).
    • Is much less oil and oil-product (fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, etc.) dependent.
    • Is much less labor intensive then traditional “slavery to the land” agriculture.
    • Is much more respectful towards and integrative with trees and forests
    • Is much more respectful towards  and integrative with animals.
    • Is much more diverse.
    • Is inherently organic.
    • Is much more efficient and reliable.
    • … in other words … more sustainable, more reliable, less expensive, less work, more and better food, more profits.
  2. Funding our continued research projects on diverse aspects of sustainable village life in Romania in the hope that others (hopefully a younger generation) will be inspired to give it a try.
  3. Creating a non-profit that will support the ongoing operation of the project and shelter it and everyone involved (peasants, members and us) from potential hostilities.
  4. Supporting other social endeavours that we would like to explore (that are too early to unveil and way beyond the scope of this post).

… and it’s all just getting started … so who knows what that list may look like in the near and far future 🙂

 

 

 

Them

There is a fascinating aspect to Cutia Taranului. If you haven’t heard about it yet then it is a CSA (community supported agriculture) type of service which makes it possible for small scale, local producers to sell their produce directly to customers in the city.  In most western cultures food production is largely controlled by large agro-businesses with a (growing) backdrop of small producers who sell to local communities. Here in Romania almost half of the population are peasants who feed themselves and make a scarce living by selling their produce. That means that Cutia Taranului has huge potential outreach … theoretically making it possible for half of the population to feed the other half. It excites me every time I think about.

We’ve been warned quite a few times (so far, by caring people) that the project could generate some serious backfire. If the project spreads, as we hope it will, it could have some … noticeable economic implications. It may cause quite a bit of business to shift from current market places and supermarket chains, directly back into the hands of peasants. That may agitate many stakeholders who are vested in these relatively new  and dominating businesses. So we’ve been warned that they may … get defensive and aggressive. They can be:

  • Supermarket chains who have invested heavily in their infrastructures all over Romania will naturally want to protect their investments.
  • Owners of “market place shopping malls” (closed structures which were built where once there were simple, open farmers-markets which charged a symbolic fee) who charge peasants impossible space rental fees.
  • Organized crime syndicates (which we know little about but have heard mentioned numerous times) who I assume have their vested interests.
  • Government agencies that may be curious about higher levels of income. Peasants are currently registered as small producers and exempt from taxes (after all, no one expects a peasant to be make enough income to justify paying taxes).
  • Government agencies that are used to and expect traditional methods of agriculture and may be threatened by change (our intentions is to change not just how peasant make money but more importantly how they work the land and how they grow food).
  • Corrupt government officials … simply because corruption is a dominant force in Romanian government (national and local) who may either lose their foothold or be interested in getting in on the new action.

Our first reaction to these potential threats is a smile. When Cutia Taranului reaches a point where it draws this kind of attention we’ll know we’ve done something wonderful. It is also amazing to witness how, from a sustainable/ecological perspective, the law and outlaws seem to come together through opposition.

However there is also discomfort. Cutia Taranului has no malintent towards anyone. We are not against supermarkets or city-markets or government (though we are against greed and corruption) … nothing we do is defined as being opposition … everything we do is for someone or something:

  • for peasants who we would like to be able to make a decent living and live a better life.
  • for a peasant life style which is dying and we wish to see revived and refreshed.
  • for city dwellers who we wish will be able to enjoy fresh, healthy and local food.
  • for communities who will become healthier, stronger and more resilient through mutual support and self nurturing.
  • for Romania as a country that will reconnect with its peasant-nature and maintain its ability to feed and sustain itself.

Anyone who finds themselves not aligned with these goals is not in conflict with us or with Cutia Taranului … they are in conflict with communities … maybe even in conflict with Romania as a country. This is what gives us peace of mind. Everyone who has, so far, joined Cutia Taranului (peasant and city-member) has done so based on trust, faith and excitement. THAT is what makes it a force to be reckoned with (should reckoning be required).

Cutia Taranului has resilience designed into it. Once a relationship has been established between a peasant and box-members in the city … and once there are thousands of such relationships all over the country … there is no one central place you can go to shut it down. You can attack Cutia Taranului itself … but the ecosystem as a whole and the communities all over Romania will have a life of their own.

However there is more. We assume that Cutia Taranului itself will require some kind of legal entity. This post is a great opportunity to reach out and ask for people that can help us to do this properly. If you are a lawyer or accountant that cares about this topic as deeply as we do and can help us create a healthy formal position to complement the organic ecosystem then please do contact us.

 

Food is not cheap

One of the challenges that good & sustainable farming deals with is market prices. General wisdom amongst both producers and consumers seems to be that food is or should be cheap. General wisdom is wrong.

Satisfying Hunger

When we were still living in Israel we couldn’t afford organic products but we did make it a point to eat good nutritious whole wheat bread. It cost 3 or 4 times more then the standard white bread. This went on for many years until one day we forgot to purchase our good bread and had to settle for the regular white bread that was available in the small village shop. The bread felt empty, I had to eat twice as many slices of bread as I was used to just to satisfy my hunger. So the real price of this “cheap” bread was actually twice its label price.

Nutritional Value

That same bread had very poor nutritional value. I could at best get more calories (energy) from eating more of it but no matter how much of it I ate … I couldn’t consume what wasn’t there. There are many nutritional elements that our bodies need and expect to find in food. If those elements are not in the food we eat then we don’t supply our bodies with what they need. From there one of three things can happen:

  1. We live with deficient nutrition … and that leads to health problems which come with a heavy price (monetary and then some).
  2. We rely on food supplements that are very expensive for regular consumption.
  3. We eat too much … our bodies continuing to look for what they need … and we become overweight … fat … and obese … and that leads to other health problems which come with a heavy price.

So how cheap is that cheap food?

But even that is not the whole story.

Subsidies

In most western/industrialized countries many (if not most) food products are “protected” and regulated by subsidies. There can be diverse motivations for subsidies but the end result is that government controlled funds are passed on to producers. If, for example, egg production in your country is subsidized, that means that in addition to profits from selling eggs, a producer receives additional payment from the government. “From the government” really means “from taxpayer money” and that really means “you”.

So when you, for example, purchase an egg, in addition to what you pay in the store, you have already paid an additional sum of money through subsidies. How much? I don’t know … but it can be a substantial amount of money. Many farmers have become reliant on subsidies (rather then profits) for their sustenance.

Now consider that subsidies are just one form of market manipulation. They are a simple manipulation because they directly allocate resources for a specific purpose. What about indirect interventions? What effects do trade agreements between countries have on food prices? What effects do trade agreements between international corporations have on food prices? What effect do trade agreements between countries and corporations have on food prices? And for Romanians … what effect does corruption have on food prices?

Food is not cheap. Period.

The bottom line is that whatever you pay for food in a store does not reflect the true price (let alone value) of food. Food is more expensive to produce and deliver then we want to believe it is. It’s easy to blame large corporations and corrupt governments but we have all worked together to create this situation. We were convinced that industrialization and commercialization would be a good thing – we liked the idea of being able to have anything we want to eat available to us for low prices whenever we want it. Governments merely represent us and our desires. Large companies merely look for potential markets and try to make a profit from them. We all worked together to create the food reality we live in … and for a while it seemed nice.

Yet is hasn’t worked out has it? Food prices went up. So, being true to our dreams, we continued to push … food became even more indutrialized, efficiently processed … and …  less tasty and less nutritious … and sometimes unhealthy (in some ways even poisonous). And still food prices continued to rise … and still do … everywhere. We ended up paying more and getting less. This is a direct result of all of us, together, pursuing our dream of cheap food. Maybe its time to dream up something better?

Dreaming up something new isn’t easy to do. It demand personal sacrifice and change. We all have to re-examine our values:

  • Do we prefer to eat cheap food or healthy food?
  • Do we prefer poor food all year long or healthy food when it is naturally available?
  • Do we prefer that others prepare and pre-process our food for us or to take the time to lovingly prepare and cook our own food?
  • Do we prefer a global menu of food that comes from all over the world or a menu that is based on what grows locally?
  • Do we prefer to support industrial food production (large corporations) or small-scale local producers (our neighbors)?
  • Do we prefer “organic” food that is transported long distances or local, traditional food that is grown nearby?
  • Do we want to be dependent on international corporations for our food supply or do we want to be a self-sufficient community?
  • What is more important to us: fast cars, fancy furniture and electronic gadgets or food?

We dreamt up and created our current food-reality. We can dream up and create a better one.